Contempt of Court Act 1981

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Citation1981 c. 49
  • In this Act “
  • (1) The strict liability rule applies only in relation to publications, and for this purpose “publication” includes any speech, writing, F1programme included in a cable programme service or other communication in whatever form, which is addressed to the public at large or any section of the public.(2) The strict liability rule applies only to a publication which creates a substantial risk that the course of justice in the proceedings in question will be seriously impeded or prejudiced.(3) The strict liability rule applies to a publication only if the proceedings in question are active within the meaning of this section at the time of the publication.(4) Schedule 1 applies for determining the times at which proceedings are to be treated as active within the meaning of this section.(5) In this section “programme service” has the same meaning as in the Broadcasting Act 1990.(1) A person is not guilty of contempt of court under the strict liability rule as the publisher of any matter to which that rule applies if at the time of publication (having taken all reasonable care) he does not know and has no reason to suspect that relevant proceedings are active.(2) A person is not guilty of contempt of court under the strict liability rule as the distributor of a publication containing any such matter if at the time of distribution (having taken all reasonable care) he does not know that it contains such matter and has no reason to suspect that it is likely to do so.(3) The burden of proof of any fact tending to establish a defence afforded by this section to any person lies upon that person.(4) (1) Subject to this section a person is not guilty of contempt of court under the strict liability rule in respect of a fair and accurate report of legal proceedings held in public, published contemporaneously and in good faith.(2) In any such proceedings the court may, where it appears to be necessary for avoiding a substantial risk of prejudice to the administration of justice in those proceedings, or in any other proceedings pending or imminent, order that the publication of any report of the proceedings, or any part of the proceedings, be postponed for such period as the court thinks necessary for that purpose.(2A) in the case of a report of which publication is postponed pursuant to an order under subsection (2) of this section, if published as soon as practicable after that order expires; in the case of a report of allocation or sending proceedings of which publication is permitted by virtue only of subsection (6) of section 52A of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (“ the 1998 Act ”) , if published as soon as practicable after publication is so permitted; in the case of a report of an application of which publication is permitted by virtue only of sub-paragraph (5) or (7) of paragraph 3 of Schedule 3 to the 1998 Act, if published as soon as practicable after publication is so permitted.(4)
  • A publication made as or as part of a discussion in good faith of public affairs or other matters of general public interest is not to be treated as a contempt of court under the strict liability rule if the risk of impediment or prejudice to particular legal proceedings is merely incidental to the discussion.
  • (a) prejudices any defence available at common law to a charge of contempt of court under the strict liability rule;(b) implies that any publication is punishable as contempt of court under that rule which would not be so punishable apart from those provisions;(c) restricts liability for contempt of court in respect of conduct intended to impede or prejudice the administration of justice.

    To continue reading

    Request your trial

    VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT